Dear Speed Seduction® Student,
It’s time to break out of the belief fostered by certain folks that in order to have fun or have sex with a woman, you must be open to a relationship or feel you “owe” her one.
It is time, my beloved students, friends, and fans, to shut the Romance Racketeers down.
Look: when you’re out there meeting new women, exploring new avenues, enjoying rides on the Cape Carnal-Veral Shuttle without excuses, regrets, apologies, and other bullshit so-called “price to pay” for being an HONEST man, the Romance Racketeers lose.
When you and a woman mutually agree to have some fun without complicating things, that means you both get what you want without money and time wasted on fancy dinners, flowers and chocolates, romantic cruises for two, and that rot. The Romance Racketeers do NOT like this because they’re not getting your money.
But you, as a smart guy who masters the skills, will focus instead on having fun, making out with, and yes, f@@king the women you really want to be with. Meanwhile the Romance Racketeers can go f@@k themselves, as far as you, me, and all of your fellow Speed Seduction® masters are concerned.
Most of us come from a background of being told to be “a nice guy”. Told, even if what you really want is some awesome sex with a hottie, to still make it known that you want a relationship and even make an effort to try to “find” one. You know the old saw about “stuff you say to get into her panties”… and the over-generalized connotations around the phrase “Mr. Love ‘Em And Leave ‘Em.”
Well guess what? Many women you THOUGHT you never had a chance in Hell with, actually WOULD have slept with you, in fact masturbated while thinking about you, but were afraid to get involved with you AT ALL because they weren’t ready for a relationship and took those hints-to-the-contrary you felt “obligated” to drop, at face value.
Another clue: women who are dating other guys or have busy schedules are probably not looking for a relationship either. A woman who has a “career first” mindset is unlikely to settle into a relationship, in fact she might get turned OFF by the idea. But chances are she’s not committed to waiting 5 years to get laid. Have you thought of it from HER point of view?
One last thing: how many women commisserate about wishing they could find “Mr. Right” yet seem to be having a lot of sleepovers with “Mr. Right Now?” I got news for you pal: she’s not letting Mr. Right Now in her shorts because she doesn’t want him there, even if it IS true that he’s not her “Mr. Right” that she envisions having kids and growing old with.
In fact it just might be possible she’s denying she really likes f@@king him – even complaining about what a “jerk” this “Mr. Right Now” of hers is – because she’s been programmed by the Romance Racketeer Cinema to fear “society” will call her a whore for daring to claim her choice to be a discerning, smart woman who wants to be happy and satisfied like any human being.
You know, just like the Romance Racketeers would paint you a “rake” or a “sex obsessed jerk” (the “bad guy” in any sappy romance flick…you know…the guy who f@@ks the heroine over and over before she finally “lets” the “hero” of the story be seen buying her an expensive dinner in a public place on their way to the expensive show he bought the tickets for) for daring to admit that, yes, you like a woman because she’s good in bed and you like being in bed with her.
See, these Romance Racketeer assholes are making it difficult for the women-folk too. And that’s bullshit that needs to STOP.
Now STAND UP, cast off their chains, go up to that woman you desire, and show her a BETTER choice.
Peace and piece,
RJ
P.S. With inflation these days, it’s easier than you think to drop a few hundred in just one evening on the stuff Romance Racketeers want you to spend money on… EACH time you want to get laid. What if you invested that same amount of money ONCE – in YOURSELF – and claimed the skills to get laid 100 times? Click here to learn how.
Notice how the word, “commiserate”, has “miser” and/or “miser-y” in it. 😉 hehe!! haha!!
Yeah, I’m sure Mr. Ben Bernanke and Paul Krugman love the dating mentality.. more money for them and their pals that think “inflation” is necessary for an operational economy. hahaha!!!
I admit, though, sometimes that mentality creeps up.. I feel like I owe her a present for her bday (besides sex.. something physical) or to ‘take her out’ at times. I realize power of my conscious mind, though, and do not let myself default on such behavior. I gave one chick a short happy bday wish that was not even a sentence and she responded better than if I probably got her something. hahaha! =) Good for me.. because now I remain with more rather than in debt. Even if I were Mark Zuckerberg… I wouldn’t ‘treat’ her to any material things.. besides my dick-y!!! 😀
Hail, Master! RJ! King of Pussy — Master of fantasy, desire, and giving women ecstasy and surrender! Now, with me.. I love your ideas! (except.. no surrender to me.. not in romantic way.. you can give me free stuff though.. that’s surrender.. haha!~! j/k) K, thanks.
And yeah.. I would rather give RJ $10,000 than a woman $100. Because.. RJ teaches me the infinite; non-particulars. A template is more powerful than an instance. K, I’m rambling now.. sorry.
RJ,
Since we’re on the topic of romance-I’m feeling very romantic because, when I get romantic I say to myself in economic terms it costs at least $300 “dollars”/FRN’s to wine and dine some sappy bitch, or to just pay a professional for prompt service.
FREE AT LUST!! THANK GODFATHER ROSS, I’M FREE AT LUST
Ross is absolutely correct, when I go “out” with a woman, I expect her to pay for herself, at least most of the time, but then again, isn’t that part of what a strong, independent woman is? Someone who can take care of herself, and can enjoy being with others, but isn’t needy and dependent (if you want to have women that will just suck you dry, do the opposite of what Ross says to do).
This doesn’t mean I don’t “treat” women well, in fact I still talk with many of my “ex” intimate companions, who are now just friends, and I think one of the main reasons why it isn’t so awkward is BECAUSE I always encouraged them to be independent so we can still talk and hang out.
I think I am beginning to get enlightened a bit on this. Every woman complains about what a b**stard her husband is, very few say anything good about them. There is always something wrong with boyfriends, endless arguments in relationships. No matter how good the guy, he always has a difficult time.
The answer is staring us in the face, but we will not accept it, because we have been taught to believe otherwise: women do not want relationships, they want sex.
But when the guys leave a relationship, they are upset, because they have invested in it and believe they are worth less as women because they could not keep a guy. Something that society has taught them. Even though they do not really want to be in it in the first place.
Does this sound right?
I just got burned by getting this wrong. But you’re so right. Wish I’d been able to see this all along. Got nothing to do with SS, this is just rock solid advice. I’ll pay more attention next time x
AMEN
no need to add anything more…